Peer Review Process

CENDEKIA: Journal of Science and Technology employs a rigorous peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality, original research. All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation by the editorial team to assess their suitability for the journal’s focus and scope. Manuscripts that pass this initial screening are then sent to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. We use a double-blind peer review system, meaning that both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the process to maintain objectivity and fairness.

Reviewers are asked to provide detailed, constructive feedback on the manuscript, evaluating its originality, methodology, significance, and contribution to the field. They are also required to assess the clarity of the writing, the validity of the data and conclusions, and the appropriateness of the references. Based on the reviewers’ comments, the editorial team makes a decision on the manuscript, which could result in acceptance, minor or major revisions, or rejection. Authors are given the opportunity to address reviewers’ feedback and revise their manuscripts accordingly before a final decision is made.

The peer review process at CENDEKIA is designed to uphold the integrity of academic research while providing authors with valuable input to improve their work. We strive to ensure that the review process is timely and efficient, with most reviews completed within six to eight weeks. By maintaining a high standard of peer review, CENDEKIA aims to contribute to the advancement of science and technology through the publication of robust, well-researched articles.